Insured Fails to Allege Bad Faith Damages When Settlement Was Funded by Another Insurer

A California federal district court has held that an insured did not suffer damages sufficient to support a bad faith claim for failure to indemnify because another excess insurer during a prior policy year had paid for the settlement.  Genesis Ins. Co. v. Magma Design Automation, Inc., No. 2017 WL 4642443 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2017).

An insured engaged in ten years of coverage litigation with, among others, two different first-layer excess insurers in two consecutive policy years regarding whether a settled claim was deemed first made under the first or second policy period.  The primary insurer was the same for both policy years, and it had (incorrectly) accepted a notice of circumstances as triggering coverage under the first policy period.  After two underlying class action lawsuits were filed, the primary insurer and excess insurer on the risk during the first policy period advanced the settlement payment on behalf of the insured.  During the coverage litigation, the court held that the first excess insurer could recover the settlement payment, with interest, from the second-year excess insurer.

After those rulings, the second-year excess insurer moved for summary judgment on the insured’s two remaining claims against it for breach of contract and bad faith.  The court granted its motion and held that the insured could not meet its burden of proving any damages because the insured’s other insurers had funded the settlement.  The court also rejected the insured’s argument that it incurred damages in the form of attorneys’ fees and costs in coverage litigation with other insurers, finding that those fees were not proximately caused by the second-year insurer’s alleged breach.  Finally, the court also granted summary judgment on the bad faith claim on the basis that the insured’s bad faith claim was not viable as a matter of law without a valid claim for breach of contract.

Tags

Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek