Notice Prejudice Rule Applies to Claim Not Reported “As Soon As Practicable” But Within Policy Period

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas, applying Kansas law, has held that an insurer must show prejudice to deny coverage when an insured provided notice of a claim within the policy’s three-year policy period, but not “as soon as practicable” as required by the policy’s notice provision. Ottowa Bancshares, Inc. v. Great Am. Spec. Ins. Co., 2025 WL 343494 (D. Kan., Jan. 30, 2025).

The insured, a bank holding company with four affiliated banks, purchased a claims-made directors and officers liability policy, which had a three-year policy period. The policy’s notice and reporting provision required notice to the insurer “as soon as practicable, of any Claim first made and brought to the attention of an Executive Officer during the Policy Period,” but in no event later than ninety days (or one hundred and eighty days if the policy is renewed) after the Claim is made.

During the first policy year, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of one of the insured’s affiliated banks received a demand letter for over $4 million in fees allegedly owed by the insured pursuant to a consulting services contract. The insured’s board and the insurer were not notified about the demand, although the insured retained counsel to represent it. Subsequently, a lawsuit was filed against the insured one year later in 2023, during the second policy year. The insurer was notified one month after the lawsuit was filed (but thirteen months after the initial demand letter was received).

The insurer denied coverage based on the insured’s thirteen-month delay in reporting the demand letter. The insured subsequently filed suit against the insurer, and the insurer moved for summary judgment, arguing that: (1) notice was not provided as soon as practicable; (2) the notice-prejudice rule is inapplicable to claims-made policies; and (3) even if the notice-prejudice rule applied, the insurer was prejudiced by the insured’s untimely notice.

The court first determined that the thirteen-month delay in reporting the claim was unreasonable as a matter of law. Nevertheless, the court also concluded that, because the claim was reported during the policy’s three-year policy period, the insurer still had to show prejudice in order to deny coverage. Finally, the court ruled that a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the insurer was prejudiced by the delay in reporting.

Practice Areas

Wiley Executive Summary

Sign up for updates

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek